[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311)" <alan.h.feiveson@nasa.gov> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: RE: instrumental variable nomenclature |

Date |
Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:22:40 -0500 |

Hi Mark, Stas - Sorry, I think I didn't explain the causative sequence properly. What I should have said was that Z affects X through X = h(Z) + d, where d is an error term independent of e. For example, Z is a dose and X is a (non-observable) effect. That's why I thought that Z would be an instrument for X rather than the other way around. Does your interpretation still with the above causative sequence? Thanks Al -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Schaffer, Mark E Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 2:07 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: RE: instrumental variable nomenclature Al, > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Feiveson, > Alan H. (JSC-SK311) > Sent: 25 August 2008 19:26 > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Subject: st: instrumental variable nomenclature > > Hi - I am looking for a name/title to describe the following > simulatenous-equation model: > > This starts with a linear regression model Y = X*b + e, but X is not > observed. However we know X is correlated with an observable variable > Z, with error term independent of e. So at this point, would it be > correct to say this is an instrumental variable model with Z as an > instrument for X? Not quite. Say the "true model" is Y = X*b + e but you estimate Y = Z*b + u Z is an imperfect measure of X. Say that Z = X*a + v This is the classic measurement error problem. If you had an instrument for X, you could get a consistent estimate of b using linear IV. HTH. Cheers, Mark > Furthermore we also observe K = g(X) where g is a step function (for > example, K follows an ordered probit model with X as the latent > variable). So to get the nomenclature straight, can I say that this is > a nonlinear simultaneous equation model (one equation for Y given X, > and one for K given X), with Z as an "instrumental variable for X"? > > Of course, how to estimate such a model is another story! > > Thanks for whatever suggestions (names or estimation > approach) you can provide. > > Al Feiveson > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under charity number SC000278. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: RE: RE: instrumental variable nomenclature***From:*"Stas Kolenikov" <skolenik@gmail.com>

**st: RE: RE: RE: instrumental variable nomenclature***From:*"Schaffer, Mark E" <M.E.Schaffer@hw.ac.uk>

**References**:**st: instrumental variable nomenclature***From:*"Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311)" <alan.h.feiveson@nasa.gov>

**st: RE: instrumental variable nomenclature***From:*"Schaffer, Mark E" <M.E.Schaffer@hw.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: STATA 11 release date guesses?** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Any way to annotate a Stata graph with LaTeX?** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: instrumental variable nomenclature** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: RE: RE: instrumental variable nomenclature** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |