[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Partha Deb <partha.deb@hunter.cuny.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: question with MLE and complex model |

Date |
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:02:48 -0400 |

Jonathan,

The easiest thing to do is try the following:

fmm y x1 x2 x3, components(2) mixtureof(normal) search(on) prob(z1 z2 z3)

fmm y x1 x2 x3, components(3) mixtureof(normal) search(on) prob(z1 z2 z3) from(?)

If a 3-component model follows a 2-component model, it gets "smart" starting values based on the parameters in the 2-component model.

If you prefer to use -from()-, enter parameter values (separated by spaces) in the other they would appear in the output. Obviously this is hard to guess if you've never seen any output from -fmm- so I recommend the "two-step" approach first.

Best.

Partha

Jonathan Hanson wrote:

Partha,

Thank you for your suggestion. I've downloaded the fmm procedure and am experimenting with it. One question: I get a message stating that I should provide starting values, which appears to be done using the from() option. What is the form with which starting values are provided?

For example, if I use:

fmm y x1 x2 x3, components(3) mixtureof(normal) search(on) prob(z1 z2 z3) from(?)

what replaces the question mark?

Many thanks!

Jonathan

On Jul 30, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Partha Deb wrote:

Jonathan,

It appears that the model you are trying to estimate (in principle) is a finite mixture of 3 normal densities - your code is not quite that, however. Unless you are sure yours is the model you want, I suggest you estimate a standard finite mixture model for the problem you describe. You can code that up yourself or use -fmm- . -findit fmm- will get you to the link to install it.

Best.

Partha

Jonathan Hanson wrote:

Greetings,

I am working on an MLE procedure to use in situations where there may be distinct, or at least mostly distinct, causal processes at work for different parts of the sample. For example, suppose there are three different states of the world, and the coefficients on key explanatory variables vary across these states. Additionally, suppose that there is a set of variables that determines (probabilistically) the extent to which to a particular case falls into each state.

In other words, I have three linear models: mod1, mod2, and mod3. Also, I have a weighting function, similar to that used in multinomial logit, that estimates a set of weights that sum to 1: p1 + p2 + p3.

I am fairly new to ML programming, so I started with the ML version of a standard linear regression (with adjustments to s_e suggested by Gould and Sribney) and incorporated the three linear models with their corresponding weighting functions. The trouble is, when I try to estimate the model, Stata goes through thousands of iterations, nearly all of which report "not concave". Convergence is achieved only rarely, and it depends very much upon specification.

program define stage3ml

args lnf mod1 st1 mod2 st2 mod3 ctrls s_e

tempvar den p1 p2 p3

quietly gen double `den' = 1 + exp(`st1') + exp(`st2')

quietly gen double `p1' = exp(`st1')/`den'

quietly gen double `p2' = exp(`st2')/`den'

quietly gen double `p3' = 1/`den'

quietly replace `lnf'=ln(normalden(($ML_y1 - `p1'*`mod1' - `p2'*`mod2' - `p3'*`mod3' - `ctrls')/exp(`s_e'))) - `s_e'

end

ml model lf stage3ml (mod1: y = x1 x2 x3) (p1: z1 z2 z3) (mod2: x1 x2 x3) (p2: z1 z2 z3) (mod3: x1 x2 x3) (ctrs: ) ()

Any advice on what steps I should next take would be greatly appreciated!

Many thanks,

Jonathan Hanson

Assistant Professor of Political Science

Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs

100 Eggers Hall

Syracuse University

Syracuse, NY 13244

johanson@maxwell.syr.edu

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

-- Partha Deb Department of Economics Hunter College ph: (212) 772-5435 fax: (212) 772-5398 http://urban.hunter.cuny.edu/~deb/ Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery None but ourselves can free our minds. - Bob Marley * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/_______________________________________ Jonathan Hanson Assistant Professor of Political Science Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs 100 Eggers Hall Syracuse University Syracuse, NY 13244 johanson@maxwell.syr.edu * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

-- Partha Deb Department of Economics Hunter College ph: (212) 772-5435 fax: (212) 772-5398 http://urban.hunter.cuny.edu/~deb/ Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery None but ourselves can free our minds. - Bob Marley * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: question with MLE and complex model***From:*Partha Deb <partha.deb@hunter.cuny.edu>

**References**:**st: question with MLE and complex model***From:*Jonathan Hanson <johanson@maxwell.syr.edu>

**Re: st: question with MLE and complex model***From:*Partha Deb <partha.deb@hunter.cuny.edu>

**Re: st: question with MLE and complex model***From:*Jonathan Hanson <johanson@maxwell.syr.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: Scatterplot: Weighted markers change size** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: question with MLE and complex model** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: question with MLE and complex model** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: question with MLE and complex model** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |