[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Benjamin Klaus" <ben_klaus@gmx.de> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: problems with global macros in mata |

Date |
Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:35:31 +0200 |

Thank you very much for your answer, it works now! Indeed, I only tried to use global macros since I couldn't find the correct syntax for using the mata variable 'i' in order to create a flexible file name. This kind of syntax when trying to combine string components and numeric components is - at least from my perspective - not very well described in the mata help. What also confuses me is the fact that 'st_global("i",strofreal(i))' and 'stata("display $i")' actually work when you execute it manually in the command window (being in mata), but doesn't when it is part of a do-file... Benjamin -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:44:50 -0500 > Von: wgould@stata.com > An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Betreff: Re: st: problems with global macros in mata > Benjamin Klaus <ben_klaus@gmx.de> writes, > > > I want to export the (changing) content of a matrix "x" from mata into > > textfiles named "mi.txt", where "i" is a global macro. This should work > in > > the following way, but it seems that the value of the global macro is > not > > changed correctly at each stage of the loop... > > > > > > mata > > x = (76, 53, 48 \ 53, 88, 46 \ 48, 46, 63) > > i=0 > > while (i<=5) { > > > > i = i + 1 > > st_global("i",strofreal(i)) > > stata("display($i)") // just to check the value > > // (it doesn't work) > > mm_outsheet("D:\m$i.txt", strofreal(x), "replace") > > } > > end > > First let me address the problem asked about, and then let me give a > better > way to proceed. Let's simplify the above to read > > mata > i = 0 > while (i<=5) { > i = i + 1 > st_global("i", strofreal(i)) > stata("display $i") > } > > As Benjamin notes, it does not work: It displays nothing. What will work > is > changing > > stata("display $i") > > to > > stata("display $" + "i") > > What was happening is that, at compile time -- at the time the lines were > entered into Mata, the contents of $i were substituted, so -stata("display > $i")- > became -stata("display ")-. The way I just coded it, $ and i do not > appear > adjacent yet, at execution time, the string "display $i" is assembled and > then that is substituted when it goes to Stata. > > Now let's talk about mm_outsheet("D:\m$i.txt", strofreal(x), "replace"). > Obviously, there is the issue of $i, and so the line could be replaced > with > > mm_outsheet("D:\m$"+"i.txt", strofreal(x), "replace") > > There still may be aproblem, however, depending on what mm_outsheet() > does with its first argument. I am not familiar with the function > -mm_outsheet()-, but understand, Mata at execution time does NOT > substitute > macros. "$i" just means "$i". The reason -stata(display $" + "i")- > worked > is that -display $i- was passed to Stata, and Stata expanded the macro $i. > > Mata expands macros at compile time, but not at execution time. > > One solution would be to use -st_macroexpand()-, the Mata function that > expands macros: > > mm_outsheet(st_macroexpand("D:\m$"+"i.txt"), strofreal(x), > "replace") > > That would work, but it is not the solution I am recommending. > > At this point, Benjamin must be thinking that working with macros in Mata > is > mighty inconvenient. He would be right. Macros, so natural in Stata, are > not natural in Mata and in fact are not necessary. The better way to > code the problem would be, > > i = 0 > while (i<=5) { > i = i + 1 > mm_outsheet("D:\m"+strofreal(i)+".txt", strofreal(x), > "replace") > } > > We might also use -for- rather than while, > > for (i=1; i<=5; i++) { > mm_outsheet("D:\m"+strofreal(i)+".txt", strofreal(x), > "replace") > } > > and perhaps the code would be more easily read if we coded, > > for (i=1; i<=5; i++) { > fn = "D:\m" + strofreal(i) + ".txt" > mm_outsheet(fn, strofreal(x), "replace") > } > > or > > for (i=1; i<=5; i++) { > fn = sprintf("D:\m%g.txt", i) > mm_outsheet(fn, strofreal(x), "replace") > } > > -- Bill > wgould@stata.com > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ -- Psssst! Schon das coole Video vom GMX MultiMessenger gesehen? Der Eine für Alle: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/messenger03 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: problems with global macros in mata***From:*wgould@stata.com (William Gould, StataCorp LP)

- Prev by Date:
**st: time series and SUR** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: time series and SUR** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: problems with global macros in mata** - Next by thread:
**st: Help on data analysis strategy** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |