[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Joseph Coveney" <jcoveney@bigplanet.com> |

To |
"Statalist" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: How do I test that two subsample have different coefficient of variation? |

Date |
Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:06:35 +0900 |

Peter Lachenbruch wrote: Perhaps a naïve approach would be to bootstrap the cv with a few thousand reps. An obvious problem arises if the mean is near 0. I suspect one should restrict this to positive random variables, but I have no theory to go on. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Another naive approach would be using maximum likelihood estimation of mu and sigma. This would be followed by -nlcom- to test the ratios (or, for that matter, their inverses should they be deemed more suitable). An example is in the do-file below, which uses -mynormal_d2- from W. Gould, J. Pitblado & W. Sribney, _Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Stata. Third Edition._ (College Station, Texas: Stata Press, 2006). I'm not sure how well this approach compares to bootstrapping. The delta method, upon which -nlcom- depends, as well as maximum likelihood estimation, itself, might require larger samples than what is customarily contemplated when coefficients of variance are used. Coeffient of variation is popular in pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics. It's also de rigeur in analytical (chemistry) methods development in the pharmaceutical industry, where it's known as the relative standard deviation (RSD). Practitioners of these professions avoid the "obvious problem" by defining a so-called limit of quantitation (LOQ) at which they quit before things get too close to zero. (Actually, increasing to a threshold RSD at progressively lower analyte levels is used in establishing the LOQ for an assay.) Joseph Coveney clear * set more off * // mynormal_d2.ado from Gould, Pitblado & Sribney (2006), p. 267--68 program define mynormal_d2 version 9.2 args todo b lnf g negH g1 g2 tempvar mu lnsigma sigma mleval `mu' = `b', eq(1) mleval `lnsigma' = `b', eq(2) quietly { generate double `sigma' = exp(`lnsigma') mlsum `lnf' = ln(normalden($ML_y1, `mu', `sigma')) if (`todo' == 0 | missing(`lnf')) exit tempvar z tempname dmu dlnsigma generate double `z' = ($ML_y1 - `mu') / `sigma' replace `g1' = `z' / `sigma' replace `g2' = `z' * `z' - 1 mlvecsum `lnf' `dmu' = `g1', eq(1) mlvecsum `lnf' `dlnsigma' = `g2', eq(2) matrix define `g' = (`dmu', `dlnsigma') if (`todo' == 1 | missing(`lnf')) exit tempname d11 d12 d22 mlmatsum `lnf' `d11' = 1 / `sigma' / `sigma', eq(1) mlmatsum `lnf' `d12' = 2 * `z' / `sigma', eq(1,2) mlmatsum `lnf' `d22' = 2 * `z' * `z', eq(2) matrix define `negH' = (`d11', `d12' \ `d12', `d22') } end * set seed `=date("2008-07-11", "YMD")' set obs 100 generate byte group = _n > _N / 2 generate double response = (1 + group) * (100 + invnormal(uniform())) tabulate group, generate(group_) ml model d2 mynormal_d2 (mu: response = group_1 group_2, /// noconstant) (lnsigma: group_1 group_2, noconstant) ml maximize, nolog estimates store A nlcom (CV1: exp(_coef[lnsigma:group_1]) / _coef[mu:group_1]) /// (CV2: exp(_coef[lnsigma:group_2]) / _coef[mu:group_2]), post test _b[CV1] = _b[CV2] // <-- Here tabstat response, stat(cv) by(group) // Inverse coefficient of variation estimates restore A nlcom (InvCV1: _coef[mu:group_1] / exp(_coef[lnsigma:group_1])) /// (InvCV2: _coef[mu:group_2] / exp(_coef[lnsigma:group_2])), post test _b[InvCV1] = _b[InvCV2] // Cf. RMSE from OLS regression estimates restore A display %5.3f exp(_coef[lnsigma:group_1]) display %5.3f exp(_coef[lnsigma:group_2]) regress response if !group regress response if group exit * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: problems with merging datasets** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: use -nlsur- to deal with nonlinear IV estimation?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: How do I test that two subsample have different coefficient of variation?** - Next by thread:
**st: XBRL format** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |