Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Silly addenda


From   Marcello Pagano <pagano@hsph.harvard.edu>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Silly addenda
Date   Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:57:46 -0400

You did and you didn't; i.e. you did post to Statalist and you did not follow my advice.
My advice is to please read
http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
where it is plainly stated (see Section 2.2) that you should refrain from adding gunk to your mail.
Your S/MIME Cryptographic Signature qualifies as gunk.

If you look at
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/lwgate/STATALIST/archives/statalist.0807/date/article-359.html
you will see what your message looks like to some; and thus an explanation for my use of "gunk".

m.p.


On 7/9/2008 6:35 PM, Robert McCullough wrote:

Ah, Dr. Pagano, while your point is appreciated, you may well live in a kinder and gentler world than the rest of us. This boilerplate is required by law in many states if you are going to seek return of, or redress against, misaddressed or purloined emails. I am not likely to post to Stata, but if I do, I'll follow your advice.

Marcello Pagano wrote:

Dear Listers,

In the spirit of saving bandwidth, if you are posting something on a list that will be seen by many, it seems silly to me to have an addendum that says something like,

Privileged, confidential or patient identifiable information may be
contained in this message. This information is meant only for the use of
the intended recipients. If you are not the intended recipient, or if
the message has been addressed to you in error, do not read, disclose,
reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this transmission.
Instead, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and then destroy all
copies of the message and any attachments.

All too often too these are not in Plain Text and that causes havoc for some. So please refrain from automatically adding this drivel to your messages. BTW, do you really think any one pays attention to such a message, anyway?

Thanks,

m.p.

*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index