[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Michael Manti <statboy3000@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Mata versus Matlab |

Date |
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:29:20 -0400 |

Excellent point about the proprietary-software-with-freeware- extensions similarity, Nick.

With regard to graphics, I was thinking principally of some of the idiosyncracies of --graph combine--. The interactions among the various areas, labels, etc. are sometimes hard to predict-- particularly with regard to lining up elements across constituent graphs. My recollection was that this is more predictable in MATLAB. I wish I had an example at hand of a graph that was easier to produce in Stata than MATLAB to illustrate my meaning. The fault may well lie with me rather than with Stata.

Another minor advantage that MATLAB graphics have over Stata's is that MATLAB supports a limited subset of TeX in text elements of graphics. Last I checked, this is not the case for Stata. I suspect that a workaround for PostScript graphics may be the LaTeX psfrag package.

Michael Manti

On Jul 7, 2008, at 1:30 PM, Nick Cox wrote:

This seems a very fair summary from what I know. I'd add that Stata and

MATLAB have a major similarity as proprietary software but with many

user-written extras available freely and publicly.

I'd be interested to know more details of how "it is sometimes easier to

trick MATLAB than Stata into producing unsupported graph types". That

would be a challenge either for Stata graphics programmers to show how

such types can be supported or as agenda items for StataCorp. I

specifically exclude 3-D graphics where -- to my great regret -- it is

clear that MATLAB is currently superior to Stata.

Nick

n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk

Michael Manti

Rajesh,

I've used both Stata and MATLAB reasonably extensively. Stata is my

main tool for statistical work. I've used MATLAB to do statistical

work, but I've used it mostly for financial simulations. I much prefer

Stata over MATLAB for statistical work.

For my purposes, the biggest disadvantage of MATLAB over Stata/Mata is

cost. If you want to use MATLAB as your main tool for statistical

work, you need to pay up for the Statistics and Optimization (and

perhaps other) toolkits. All MATLAB toolkits are sold separately,

whereas Stata bundles many procedures, and many more are downloadable.

Even then, my guess is that you're much more likely to find a given

statistical procedure implemented in Stata (or R) than you are in

MATLAB.

Stata is much better than MATLAB for managing data, logging research,

and producing tables. For statistical graphics, I generally prefer

Stata's defaults over MATLAB's--tick marks that poke into the plot

area, ugh!--but it is sometimes easier to trick MATLAB than Stata into

producing unsupported graph types.

I suspect that more numerical routines are available in MATLAB than in

Mata. MATLAB the language also supports some nice programming

abstractions--higher-order functions, lexical scoping, arrays of

higher dimension than 2, etc.--that Mata lacks. Mata's pointers only

partially make up for these omissions. However, I really appreciate

Mata's optional type declarations, which have saved me from boneheaded

errors on occasion.

Rajesh Tharyan

Does anyone have any extensive experience of using both of these? If so what are the advantages of Mata over Matlab or vice versa? Or is there a good reference on comparison of capabilities?* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: Mata versus Matlab***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**References**:**Re: st: Mata versus Matlab***From:*Michael Manti <statboy3000@gmail.com>

**RE: st: Mata versus Matlab***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Interpreting -pergram- results** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: How to run Granger Causality Test?** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: Mata versus Matlab** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Mata versus Matlab** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |