[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Verkuilen, Jay" <JVerkuilen@gc.cuny.edu> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: probit questions |

Date |
Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:35:11 -0400 |

Sun, Yan (IFPRI) wrote: >I have couple of questions about the Probit model. My dependent variable is a 0/1 binary choice (1=invest in technology, 0=no investment) for user groups, independent variables are user groups' characteristics (around 20). >1) Which model is correct one: Probit or Logit? What is the STATA command for checking this? Unless you have very large samples (which you don't), they are nearly indistinguishable. In general there is reason to prefer logit to probit when you have potentially extreme probabilities. The logistic distribution is very much like a t with 10 df in shape. The classic example of being able to tell the difference appears in chess ranking. The Elo system is, essentially, based on logistic regression. It was originally based on probit but in practice it turned out that the probit didn't make enough extreme predictions. >2) I have small observations (total 170 observations, but valid obs. Is only around 60 for all independent >variables), sometimes the regression does not report report "wald chi2" statistics. What is the reason for this? >3) I got a note after right after the regression, which says "8 failures and 7 successes completely determined", >what does this means? Simply put you have too many independent variables for your sample. It sounds like you may have some missing data as well, since the number of valid observations is much smaller than the number of observations. The standard errors and Wald statistics failing is one sign. The perfect predictions is another. You need to deal with the missing data (-findit ice-) and even then, you have WAY too many independent variables for 170 observations. Very roughly speaking, you should have 10 observations per variable, and probably more for binary data, which don't have that much information per observation. Either get more data or get rid of variables. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: RE: RE: probit questions***From:*"Shehzad Ali" <sia500@york.ac.uk>

**References**:**st: probit questions***From:*"Sun, Yan (IFPRI)" <Y.SUN@CGIAR.ORG>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: probit questions** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: calculating means by group, with weights** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: probit questions** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: RE: probit questions** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |