[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: local r(varlist)? |

Date |
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:21:15 +0100 |

To expand slightly: I think of it this way: r(varlist) is a local macro in the wide sense but not in the strict sense. `r(varlist)' is in effect a request: treat r(varlist) as if it were a local macro. The error message from >> . foreach v of local r(varlist) { >> (error message: "{ required") is not transparent here, but it is a side-effect of Stata when it reads your command line not understanding your syntax. The parser won't do evaluations on the fly unless so instructed, which is why you need here to spell out using the ` ' notation that you want the contents of the "macro" to be visible to -foreach-. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Austin Nichols Keith Dear <keith.dear@anu.edu.au>: Martin Weiss's claim about -foreach- is incorrect; you can use either -in- or -of any- with -foreach- to mean the same thing, though I believe the -of any- syntax is undocumented. More to the point, r(varlist) is not the name of a local macro, so it cannot serve this role: foreach v of local r(varlist) { though I do think the error message should be more informative there. The `r(varlist)' trick for accessing returned results (or system parameters etc.) inline is equivalent to `: di r(varlist)' for most purposes (with only one exception I can think of off the top of my head) which is equivalent to a two-step approach defining a new local macro, i.e. these three -foreach- loops are equivalent: ds foreach v in `r(varlist)' { di "`: var l `v''" } local r: di r(varlist) foreach v in `r' { di "`: var l `v''" } foreach v of local r { di "`: var l `v''" } *but this is not equivalent: local r=r(varlist) foreach v in `r' { di "`: var l `v''" } (though it will give equivalent results in many cases) since the equal sign truncates the result at about 245 characters. See -help extended_fcn- and [P] macro for more info. On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Martin Weiss <martin.weiss@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote: > See -h foreach- to note that you must say -in- with -anything- <snip> > > Zitat von Keith Dear <keith.dear@anu.edu.au>: > >> This is a small point I am puzzled by, but in the interests of knowing >> how Stata thinks: >> >> Following -ds- (and I guess many other commands), >> >> this works: >> . foreach v of any `r(varlist)' { >> (so r(varlist) is behaving like a local macro) >> >> but this doesn't: >> . foreach v of local r(varlist) { >> (error message: "{ required") >> >> what am I misunderstanding here? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Estimating a choice model with allocations***From:*"Data Analytics Corp." <dataanalytics@earthlink.net>

**st: local r(varlist)?***From:*Keith Dear <keith.dear@anu.edu.au>

**Re: st: local r(varlist)?***From:*Martin Weiss <martin.weiss@uni-tuebingen.de>

**Re: st: local r(varlist)?***From:*"Austin Nichols" <austinnichols@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: 64 bit Stata for the Mac /feature request** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: using different macros everytime** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: local r(varlist)?** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Estimating a choice model with allocations** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |