Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Problem with xtmixed


From   SamL <saml@demog.berkeley.edu>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: Problem with xtmixed
Date   Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:34:35 -0700 (PDT)

I have wondered about the way in which xtmixed seems not to match the syntax of other multi-equation commands with which I am familiar. I am thinking of heckman, sureg, and other such commands as examples.

I have wondered whether xtmixed matches the syntax of other multi-equation commands with which I am not familiar. If not, I have wondered whether there is any way xtmixed could be written so that the syntax matched some of the other multi-equation commands in stata.

So, asking explicitly: Could xtmixed be written so that the syntax matched some of the other multi-equation commands in stata?

Both gllamm and xtmixed *seem* very different from the usual stata syntax.

Sam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index