[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
SamL <saml@demog.berkeley.edu> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: Problem with xtmixed |

Date |
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:34:35 -0700 (PDT) |

I have wondered about the way in which xtmixed seems not to match the syntax of other multi-equation commands with which I am familiar. I am thinking of heckman, sureg, and other such commands as examples.

I have wondered whether xtmixed matches the syntax of other multi-equation commands with which I am not familiar. If not, I have wondered whether there is any way xtmixed could be written so that the syntax matched some of the other multi-equation commands in stata.

So, asking explicitly: Could xtmixed be written so that the syntax matched some of the other multi-equation commands in stata?

Both gllamm and xtmixed *seem* very different from the usual stata syntax.

Sam

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: Problem with xtmixed***From:*"rgutierrez@stata.com" <rgutierrez@stata.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: string_functions "Titlecase"?** - Next by Date:
**st: string function "Sentence case"** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Problem with xtmixed** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Problem with xtmixed** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |