Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: HC3 after wls


From   "Sergio R" <seroz26@gmail.com>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: HC3 after wls
Date   Tue, 27 May 2008 13:26:11 -0300

Hi,

My hedonic model for a housing price index is a pooled cross sections 
(independents) with 13 dummy time entries (each one for a quarter year).
Stata 10 allow for the use of robust standard errors after weighted least 
squares (analitycal weight).
So I applied the robust option (HC3) after WLS. I think that´s correct, but 
I couldn´t find any support in the literature.
Does anyone know of any academic articles that support that form?
Statistically thinking, is the use of robust option after WLS correct?

Thanks,
Sergio 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index