[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Stas Kolenikov" <skolenik@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: STATA: multivariate probit w/ bootstrap |

Date |
Thu, 1 May 2008 12:11:46 -0500 |

Then you should extend the code I gave, with either -post- or -bootstrap: mymvprobit-, and include WTP estimation for each sample, to be -posted- or -bootstrap-ped along with the coefficients. If you can express WTP as the function of estimated parameters, then you should consider -nlcom- that would give you the delta method standard errors -- if you can technically do that, I would not bother with the bootstrap. You would probably find yourself wasting a week of your time setting your bootstrap up properly, to find the standard errors only differ in the third decimal point from those in -nlcom-. If you want to do something really cool, you should set this up as a Bayesian estimation procedure, where you would repeatedly sample unobserved epsilons for your probit part, and parameter values from (approximation to) the posterior. Then for each constellation of the parameter estimates, you can compute the WTP, and get an MCMC distribution of these. That's some work for WinBUGS, or may be R, rather than Stata, though. On 5/1/08, Daniel R. Petrolia <Petrolia@agecon.msstate.edu> wrote: > Stas, > Thanks a lot for your detailed suggestions. We are interested in willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates, the mean of which requires both the estimated coefficients and the variable means to calculate. What we would like to get is a confidence interval on our mean WTP, which, based on research, it is suggested that one bootstrap to derive a sample of anywhere from 50 to 1000 mean WTP estimates, and drop 2.5% of obs in the tails for a 95% C.I. Well, to do this, we need to estimate our model over a number of bootstrapped samples. This is easy enough with probit or even biprobit, but in our case, we have 3 probit equations whose errors are correlated and thus, ideally, should be estimated together. Thus, the need for mvprobit or triprobit. > Our latest attempt is to generate the required number of samples using SAS, then estimated the regression on each sample manually. -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: Please do not reply to my Gmail address as I don't check it regularly. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: STATA: multivariate probit w/ bootstrap***From:*"Arne Risa Hole" <arnehole@gmail.com>

**References**:**Re: st: STATA: multivariate probit w/ bootstrap***From:*"Stas Kolenikov" <skolenik@gmail.com>

**Re: st: STATA: multivariate probit w/ bootstrap***From:*"Stas Kolenikov" <skolenik@gmail.com>

**Re: st: STATA: multivariate probit w/ bootstrap***From:*"Daniel R. Petrolia" <Petrolia@agecon.msstate.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Matrix manipulation.** - Next by Date:
**st: Stata comments** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: STATA: multivariate probit w/ bootstrap** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: STATA: multivariate probit w/ bootstrap** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |