[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu, <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: RE: Testing nested models using logistic regression with robust standard errors |

Date |
Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:20:09 -0500 |

At 04:47 PM 4/28/2008, Lachenbruch, Peter wrote:

To keep the N the same, and if vars are being entered in blocks, you can also just use nestreg, e.g.There may be a greater horror in store for us when we try to develop models - if there are missing values, the number of observations in each of the runs likely will differ. The variables you select will depend on the order in which you drop them... there are no good solutions for this. I've tried one possibility which is to require e(sample)=1 from the full model and then continue - this is equivalent (I think to a backward stepping model which is yukky. Another possibility is to use multiple imputation and then drop the least significant variables. You can't use backward stepping, but it's a simple process with ice and mim. Anyway, beware the missing value.

. use "http://www.indiana.edu/~jslsoc/stata/spex_data/ordwarm2.dta";

(77 & 89 General Social Survey)

. nestreg, quietly: logit warmlt2 (yr89 male) (white age) (ed prst), robust

Block 1: yr89 male

Block 2: white age

Block 3: ed prst

+---------------------------------+

| Block | chi2 df Pr > F |

|-------+-------------------------|

| 1 | 57.18 2 0.0000 |

| 2 | 44.49 2 0.0000 |

| 3 | 22.18 2 0.0000 |

+---------------------------------+

Again, these are all Wald tests that are being conducted, not LR tests. If you try to get lr tests, the command fails, e.g.

. nestreg, lr quietly: logit warmlt2 (yr89 male) (white age) (ed prst), robust

option lrtable is not allowed with pweights, robust, or cluster()

r(198);

Personally, I am fine with a well thought out, theoretically motivated sequence of nested models. However, just manually doing the same thing that stepwise would be doing is not such a good idea.

But yes, if you are losing data like crazy because of MD, you have to be concerned about that and figure out what to do. It is easy enough to find a way to run all your analyses on the same cases, but if those cases are atypical because of MD then you have a problem.

-------------------------------------------

Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology

OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463

HOME: (574)289-5227

EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu

WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: RE: Testing nested models using logistic regression with robust standard errors***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: RE: Testing nested models using logistic regression with robust standard errors***From:*John LeBlanc <leblancj@dal.ca>

**RE: st: RE: Testing nested models using logistic regression with robust standard errors***From:*"Lachenbruch, Peter" <Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: MadFuller with gaps** - Next by Date:
**st: -cmp- updates** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: RE: Testing nested models using logistic regression with robust standard errors** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: RE: Testing nested models using logistic regression with robust standard errors** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |