Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

[no subject]



Also, as a data provider, you would need to perform all the tweaks
like post-stratification and non-response adjustments with each set of
the replicate weights.

My small collection of links on inference through survey resampling is
available at http://www.citeulike.org/user/ctacmo/tag/survey_resampling.
There's more stuff out there, of course.

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Melanie Black <melanie.black@abs.gov.au> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>  I'm looking into using the 'svy' commands and am seeking some advice on
> their use on survey data when the design information is not known.
>
>  Say the survey was a stratified, multi-stage design, but the data does not
> contain information on the stratification or clustering, but does include
> weights and (jackknife) replicate weights. Can svy still be used, and would
> it be statistically valid to do so?
>
>  Thanks in advance for any help.
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Melanie Black
>
>  Data Access and Confidentiality Methodology Unit
>  Australian Bureau of Statistics
>  ph. +61 (02) 6252 7241
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Free publications and statistics available on www.abs.gov.au



-- 
Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name

Small print: Please do not reply to my Gmail address as I don't check
it regularly.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index