Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: z/t-value "."?


From   Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.edu>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu, statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: z/t-value "."?
Date   Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:19:12 -0500

At 04:28 PM 4/17/2008, Maarten buis wrote:
--- Markus Köller <markus-koeller@web.de> wrote:
> The output sais: 0 failures, 13 successes completely determined.

That could be the cause of the missing standard errors.

-- Maarten
Markus may want to take a look at -exlogistic- if he has Stata 10. As the help notes,

exlogistic is an alternative to logistic, the standard maximum likelihood-based logistic regression; see [R] logistic. exlogistic produces more accurate inference in small samples because it does not depend on asymptotic results and exlogistic can better deal with one-way causation, such as the case where all females are observed to have a positive outcome.




-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam


*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index