Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: newey2 versus xtpcse


From   "Clive Nicholas" <clivelists@googlemail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: newey2 versus xtpcse
Date   Mon, 3 Mar 2008 00:47:46 +0000

Mark Dincecco wrote:

> Thanks, Clive. I take it that bw(2) and not bw(1) must be used to
>  model an AR1 process.

Using -ivreg2- with the options I stated gives you a lagged OLS model
with an AR1 error process.

> The only difference I see between ivreg and
>  newey is that ivreg makes the "small" adjustment for the degrees of
>  freedom. But neither approach addresses the issue of contemporaneously
>  correlated errors, right?

I thought I'd said that, albeit in a roundabout way, last time out. I
have no more to contribute to this thread, but other listees may be
able to address this particular concern in a Stata context and in more
detail.

-- 
Clive Nicholas

[Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at
<clivenicholas@hotmail.com>. Thanks!]

"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm."
-- Winston Churchill
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index