Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

SV: SV: SV: st: From probit to dprobit to interpretation


From   <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   SV: SV: SV: st: From probit to dprobit to interpretation
Date   Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:57:16 +0100

Thanks again for helping me with the logic of these calculations.
It turned on to be a bit on the side of a typical Stata topic, sorry about that.
Alex 

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] P� vegne av Maarten buis
Sendt: 11. januar 2008 17:23
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: SV: SV: st: From probit to dprobit to interpretation

I that case you would get the expected number of successes if everybody had value 1 for X and the expected number of successes if everybody had 0 for X.

-- Maarten

--- [email protected] wrote:

> Does not that mean that this,
> 
> > Turning of the effect of X:
> > 0.99%*1000000=9900
> > 
> > Turning on the effect of X:
> > 0.29%*1000000=2900
> > 
> > Then, the way I have understood this:
> > Discrete change, reduction induced by x=9900-2900=7000?
> 
> Will be wrong? Here I have applied the on and off effects on the total 
> sample.
> In the model n=1000000, and there is 500000 members of the program 
> (x=1), thus 600000 are not member.
> I the example above I argue that x causes a reduction in the 1000000 
> sample of 7000, due to the dicrete change of .7%.
> 
> Alex
> 
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] P� vegne av Maarten buis
> Sendt: 11. januar 2008 16:11
> Til: [email protected]
> Emne: Re: SV: st: From probit to dprobit to interpretation
> 
> The separate probabilities need to be applied to their group, but the 
> discrete change needs to be applied to the total sample.
> 
> --- [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > Thanks Maarten! That is very helpful. I guess what have been
> confusing
> > for me then is how to apply the predicted -0.7% discrete change
> (the
> > difference between turning on and off the effect), on the full
> sample
> > as I have done below, or only on those 500000 that are signed up to
> 
> > the membership program. The difference offcourse making a huge
> impact
> > on the result.
> > 
> > Best wishes,
> > Alexander
> > 
> > -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> > Fra: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] P� vegne av Maarten
> buis
> > Sendt: 11. januar 2008 14:16
> > Til: stata list
> > Emne: RE: st: From probit to dprobit to interpretation
> > 
> > What you say is correct and there is no contradiction between all 
> > these statements. From a probit model you can derive predicted 
> > proportions, and with predicted proportions you can derive
> predicted
> > counts in your sample (and if you know the size of your population
> the
> > predicted counts in your population).
> > 
> > Hope this helps,
> > Maarten
> > 
> > --- [email protected] wrote:
> > I have estimated a probit model where n=1000 000 customers with
> only
> > 1 independent dummy variable (x) (for the sake of clarity), and get
> 
> > the following estimated coefficients:
> > 
> > y_pred=-2.33-0.431*x (x being significant)
> > 
> > No the way I understand this is that these coefficients, except for
> 
> > the signs and significance level, is hard to interpret. Thus, I can
> 
> > derive it as a probability model, and then again calculate 
> > probabilities from any table with standard cumulative normal 
> > distribution values. Turning on and off x will give me the discrete
> 
> > change, thus
> > 
> > Turning off the effect of X thus gives me:
> > y_pred=-2.33-(0.431*0) and
> > Pr(z<2.33)=0.99%
> > 
> > Tuning on the effect
> > y_pred=-2.33-(0.431*1)=-2.761 and
> > Pr(z<2.761)=0.29%
> > 
> > The difference between these probabilities is the discrete change,
> and
> > this change can be directly estimated using a dprobit model in
> Stata?
> > Discrete change=0.99-0.29=-0.7%
> > 
> > Most textbooks stops here, and I think that so far I am on the
> right
> > track - but I want to interpret this probability in terms of what
> this
> > x induced effect means in terms of my sample...
> > 
> > In this particular model my sample is 1000000, and x=1 is a
> membership
> > program of which there are 500000 members. Would it be correct to 
> > assume that the discrete change estimated above in terms of
> customers
> > could be interpreted as following:
> > 
> > Turning of the effect of X:
> > 0.99%*1000000=9900
> > 
> > Turning on the effect of X:
> > 0.29%*1000000=2900
> > 
> > Then, the way I have understood this:
> > Discrete change, reduction induced by x=9900-2900=7000?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Maarten L. Buis
> > Department of Social Research Methodology Vrije Universiteit
> Amsterdam
> > Boelelaan 1081
> > 1081 HV Amsterdam
> > The Netherlands
> > 
> > visiting address:
> > Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434
> > 
> > +31 20 5986715
> > 
> > http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
> > -----------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> >       ___________________________________________________________
> > Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo!
> For
> > Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
> > *
> > *   For searches and help try:
> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> > 
> > *
> > *   For searches and help try:
> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> > 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> Department of Social Research Methodology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 
> Boelelaan 1081
> 1081 HV Amsterdam
> The Netherlands
> 
> visiting address:
> Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434
> 
> +31 20 5986715
> 
> http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
> -----------------------------------------
> 
> 
>       __________________________________________________________
> Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 


-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands

visiting address:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434

+31 20 5986715

http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------


      __________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index