[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Joseph Coveney" <jcoveney@bigplanet.com> |

To |
"Statalist" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: MANCOVA versus Zellner's SUR |

Date |
Sun, 4 Nov 2007 18:56:56 -0800 |

Phil Schumm wrote: You don't indicate what the objective(s) of the analysis are (including what other covariates might be relevant), but wouldn't another option here be to compute the differences (pre to post) for each measure, and then look at how the joint distribution of those differences differs between the treatment groups? For starters, a simple test of the null hypothesis that the mean differences are the same (using, say, Hotelling's T-squared test) would presumably be informative. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your reply, Phil. The objective of the study is to determine whether there is a difference between treatments with respect to outcome as measured by the response vector. There is one other covariate, a categorical one with two levels, on which randomization is stratified. Values for that variable, too, are expected to correlate, albeit weakly, with values of the response variables, hence, the stratified randomization. Both -manova- and -sureg- can readily accommodate the stratification variable: manova L1 R1 = trt L0 R0 Stratum, category(trt Stratum) sureg (L1 = trt L0 Stratum) (R1 = trt R0 Stratum), isure small dfk The model will not contain any interaction terms. I didn't think that this stratification covariate is relevent to the matter of using baseline values of the two response variables as covariates, and so didn't mention it. The option that you mention, pre-to-post differences in Hotelling's T-squared test, is identical to the MANOVA at the bottom of my post (the MANOVA model for which time-by-treatment interaction was mentioned). It suffers from a fairly large decrease in efficiency (statistical power) vis-à-vis the corresponding MANCOVA and SUR models described earlier in the post. Joseph Coveney * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: MANCOVA versus Zellner's SUR***From:*Phil Schumm <pschumm@uchicago.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Re: unbalanced panel data with heteroskedasticity and correlation of residuals** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Re: re: how to start writing your own estimation command** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: MANCOVA versus Zellner's SUR** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: MANCOVA versus Zellner's SUR** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |