Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: conditional logistic


From   Ricardo Ovaldia <ovaldia@yahoo.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: conditional logistic
Date   Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:30:15 -0700 (PDT)

--- "William Gould, StataCorp LP" <wgould@stata.com>
wrote:

[...]  Asuming 
> one is not auditing individual clinics, why use
> -logit- or -logistic- in this
> case when -clogit- is just as easy to use, is less
> computationally intensive,
> and theoretically known to be right?  

Absolutely! That is why I chose -clogit- to model
these data. I just needed some ammunition to persuade
non believers because, as stated in my original
posting, "I was asked to defend my method, because
previous analyses on these data were performed using
indicator variables". 

Thank you,
Ricardo.


Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
Statistician 
Oklahoma City, OK

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index