[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Melonie Sullivan <meloniebeth@yahoo.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: preserving missing values in collapse (sum) |

Date |
Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:51:29 -0700 (PDT) |

Thank you, Nick. I had considered that tweak. However, I need to collapse by (youthid), which then gives me a value of allmissing for each youth, but does not tag the missing group for replacement: youthid 11 12 grp1dur 15 0 grp2dur 41 13 grp3ddur 0 0 grp4dur 0 42 grp5dur 0 0 grp6dur 0 55 allmissing 1 0 Melonie --- n j cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote: > Below my signature is the key part of the posting > referred to. > > You can tweak that approach by > > bysort youthid group (duration) : gen allmissing = > missing(duration[1]) > > and then -collapse- as before. > > Nick > n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk > > OK. Consider this toy dataset: > > . l > > +------------------+ > | response group | > |------------------| > 1. | 1 1 | > 2. | 2 1 | > 3. | 3 2 | > 4. | . 2 | > 5. | 0 3 | > |------------------| > 6. | . 3 | > 7. | . 4 | > 8. | . 4 | > +------------------+ > > I'd regard 0 as a sensible sum for group > 3 but not for group 4, but as you say > > . collapse (sum) response, by(group) > > . l > > +------------------+ > | group response | > |------------------| > 1. | 1 3 | > 2. | 2 3 | > 3. | 3 0 | > 4. | 4 0 | > +------------------+ > > One way round this is to tag groups > for which _all_ values are missing. > One way to do that is > > . bysort group (response) : gen allmissing = > mi(response[1]) > > That is, within groups, sort on response. If the > first > value within each group is missing, then all of them > in that group must be. > > The principle here is close to one explained at > http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/data/diff.html > You might also like to look at > http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/data/anyall.html > > . l > > +-----------------------------+ > | response group allmis~g | > |-----------------------------| > 1. | 1 1 0 | > 2. | 2 1 0 | > 3. | 3 2 0 | > 4. | . 2 0 | > 5. | 0 3 0 | > |-----------------------------| > 6. | . 3 0 | > 7. | . 4 1 | > 8. | . 4 1 | > +-----------------------------+ > > Now we make sure the -collapse- carries along > the important information: > > . collapse (sum) response (min) allmissing, > by(group) > > . l > > +-----------------------------+ > | group response allmis~g | > |-----------------------------| > 1. | 1 3 0 | > 2. | 2 3 0 | > 3. | 3 0 0 | > 4. | 4 0 1 | > +-----------------------------+ > > and convert back: > > . replace response = . if allmissing > (1 real change made, 1 to missing) > > . l > > +-----------------------------+ > | group response allmis~g | > |-----------------------------| > 1. | 1 3 0 | > 2. | 2 3 0 | > 3. | 3 0 0 | > 4. | 4 . 1 | > +-----------------------------+ > > Melonie Sullivan > > I have data on history of placements into different > -group-s by -youthid-: there are multiple placement > records for each youth. I need to create a variable > equal to the sum of -duration- of all placements > into > each -group- for each youth. -collapse (sum)- seems > to be > the appropriate procedure, but it treats missing > values as zeroes. This causes a problem if a youth > has > only one placement in a given group with unknown > duration. Example: > > > youthid group duration > 11 1 15 > 11 1 . > 11 2 31 > 11 2 10 > 11 5 . > 12 2 5 > 12 2 8 > 12 4 42 > 12 6 55 > > I create a duration variable for each group > (-generate > grp1dur = duration if group==1-, etc.) and -collapse > (sum)- by -youthid- and I want to get this: > > youthid 11 12 > grp1dur 15 0 > grp2dur 41 13 > grp3ddur 0 0 > grp4dur 0 42 > grp5dur . 0 > grp6dur 0 55 > > But collapse gives me a zero on grp5dur for youth > #11, > though youth #11 had placement in that group, albeit > of an unknown duration. The other zeroes are > correct; > the youth had zero days in that placement group. > > The problem has been addressed here before, best in > the following post by Nick Cox: > > http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-07/msg00783.html > > However, this is not solving my particular problem, > because my data essentially looks like a big stack > of > Nick's "toy datasets" -- one for each of 1800 youth > in > my data. So collapsing by (youthid) gives the same > value of Nick's allmissing for each youth, since the > allmissing tags missing durations for groups within > youths. > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * > http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: preserving missing values in collapse (sum)***From:*n j cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Quantile regression** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: preserving missing values in collapse (sum)** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: preserving missing values in collapse (sum)** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: preserving missing values in collapse (sum)** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |