[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
n j cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: RE: Re: st: programming graphs in stata |

Date |
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:42:09 +0100 |

Thanks for the positive comments. On 1), given -spineplot yvar xvar-, the order on the y axis is that of yvar and the order on x axis is that of xvar. An option to use some other sort order would be possible but in my view not especially good style. I have to agree with Maarten Buis, who commented MB> The way a user can do that is first install the -egenmore- MB> package from -ssc- (type -ssc install egenmore-), and MB> follow the instructions in -help egenmore- under MB> the heading -axis()-. In other words, a fairly general tool exists to do this already. The user should get the variable wanted in the sort order wanted before calling -spineplot-. (-vreverse-, as already mentioned, may also be useful.) > 2) When some categories are small or labels are longer the labels for > axis 2 (at the bottom) overlap. One way around that is to optionally > allow the user to specify an angle `myangle': > xla(`XLA', axis(2) ang(`myangle') noticks) The user can do this already without the artifice of an extra option. splineplot yvar xvar, xla(, axis(2) angle(<myangle>)) will tune the angle away from the default. All that is necessary here is that the user know that the lower of two x axes is -axis(2)-. You worked that out from the code, but I'll document it in the help. The -xla()- option of the program and the -xla()- option of the user are merged. A later version of the code is here. I changed my mind on some points and fixed a bug. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk *! NJC 1.0.1 19 Oct 2007 *! NJC 1.0.0 17 Oct 2007 program spineplot version 9 forval i = 1/20 { local baropts `baropts' bar`i'(str asis) } syntax varlist(min=2 max=2 numeric) [fweight/] [if] [in] /// [, MISSing PERCent `baropts' barall(str asis) * ] quietly { if "`missing'" != "" { marksample touse, novarlist zeroweight } else marksample touse, zeroweight count if `touse' if r(N) == 0 error 2000 tokenize "`varlist'" args y x preserve tempvar f xf xF xmid tag yF xshow if "`exp'" == "" local exp 1 contract `x' `y' if `touse' [fw=`exp'], zero f(`f') if "`percent'" != "" { local factor = 100 local la 0 25 50 75 100 local what "percent" } else { local factor 1 local la 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 local what "fraction" } bysort `x' (`y'): gen `xf' = sum(`f') by `x' : replace `xf' = `xf'[_N] by `x' : gen byte `tag' = _n == 1 gen `xF' = sum(`xf' * `tag') by `x': gen `xmid' = `xF'[_N] - 0.5 * `xf'[_N] local total = `xF'[_N] by `x' : gen `yF' = sum(`f') by `x' : replace `yF' = `factor' * `yF'/ `yF'[_N] local first = _N + 1 expand 2 if `x' == `x'[_N] replace `yF' = . in `first'/l sort `y' `x' `yF' by `y' : gen `xshow' = cond(_n == 1, 0, `xF'[_n - 1]) tokenize "`la'" forval i = 1/5 { local xla1 = (`i' - 1) * `total'/4 local xla `" `xla' `xla1' "``i''" "' } local xtitle : var label `x' if `"`xtitle'"' == "" local xtitle `x' label var `xshow' `"`what' by `xtitle'"' local ytitle : var label `y' if `"`ytitle'"' == "" local ytitle `y' label var `yF' `"`what' by `ytitle'"' levelsof `x', local(levels) foreach l of local levels { su `xmid' if `x' == `l', meanonly local l : label (`x') `l' local XLA `" `XLA' `r(min)' "`l'" "' } drop `f' `xf' `xF' `xmid' `tag' levelsof `y', local(levels) local ny : word count `levels' tokenize `levels' forval i = `ny'(-1)1 { local pipe = cond(`i' > 1, "||", "") local I = `ny' - `i' + 1 local call `call' /// bar `yF' `xshow' if `y' == ``i'' /// , bartype(spanning) blcolor(bg) blw(medium) /// `barall' `bar`I'' `pipe' local which : label (`y') ``i'' local lgnd `lgnd' `I' `"`which'"' } } twoway `call' /// xaxis(1 2) /// xsc(r(0, `total') axis(1)) /// xsc(r(0, `total') axis(2)) /// xla(`XLA', axis(2) noticks) /// xla(`xla', axis(1)) /// xtitle(`"`xtitle'"', axis(2)) /// yla(`la', ang(h) nogrid) /// legend(order(`lgnd') col(1) pos(3)) /// `options' end Schonlau, Matthias Great spineplot program Nick. I have two comments: 1) I wonder how easy it is to let the user specify the sort order along the x-axis. I think the sort order is currently a result of the "contract" statement and the following "bysort" statement, I am not sure whether this is elegant, but may be one could just pass an optional sort variable down from the main spine plot. (If the first variable in "spineplot var1 var2" is a two-level variable for highlighting, users will likely want to sort bars in order of the proportion of highlighted observations). 2) When some categories are small or labels are longer the labels for axis 2 (at the bottom) overlap. One way around that is to optionally allow the user to specify an angle `myangle': xla(`XLA', axis(2) ang(`myangle') noticks) Another option, presumably much harder to program, might be to allow for the "horizontal" option in graph twoway bar. This would result into labels on horizontal labels the y-axis which are much less likely to overlap. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: cycling paired t test (and signed rank sum test)** - Next by Date:
**st: how to create a new column** - Previous by thread:
**RE: Re: st: programming graphs in stata** - Next by thread:
**Re: RE: Re: st: programming graphs in stata** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |