Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: -mfx compute, force- not reporting se in -estout-


From   "Austin Nichols" <austinnichols@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: RE: -mfx compute, force- not reporting se in -estout-
Date   Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:19:48 -0400

Nirina--
It seems that, contrary to your first post, your problem arises not from
running -probit- followed by -mfx- but from running -biprobit-
followed by -mfx-.
Have you read
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/mfx_unsuit.html
yet?

On 10/18/07, Nirina F <fstata@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok Nick, this is a bit of details.
> I am mainly looking at the impact of binge drinking on violence
> related outcomes.
> I run probit but then biprobit. And I have controls such as  age, sex, race,
> ethnicity, religious affiliation, year in school, parents education,
> parents drinking patterns, living arrangements,type of college,
> region, and year.
> So as I said below, I have to force -mfx- to give me s.e but then
> these s.e would not even be reported in estout.  And what are the
> costs of this -force-?
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index