Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: [Mata newbie] optimize() vs -ml-


From   Antoine Terracol <terracol@univ-paris1.fr>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: [Mata newbie] optimize() vs -ml-
Date   Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:38:06 +0200

Jeff,

Thank you for your very informative answer.

I guess the bottom line is that if one cannot/does not want to use 
analytical gradient for a model that includes covariates, then one is 
better off sticking with -ml-?

Antoine


  Jeff Pitblado, StataCorp LP wrote:

> Antoine's observations to the contrary are due to the choice of evaluator
> types in the comparison.  In fact having predictors in the probit model
> accentuates the timing difference between the -v0- and -lf- evaluator types.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index