 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: pseudo r-square 4-level-logit-regression xtmelogit vs gllamm
|
From |
Martina Brandt <[email protected]> |
|
To |
[email protected] |
|
Subject |
st: pseudo r-square 4-level-logit-regression xtmelogit vs gllamm |
|
Date |
Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:27:02 +0200 |
dear list,
mc kelvey and zavoina suggest an r2 for multilevel logit regression,
which is the variance of the predicted probabilities divided by the
total variance of the model (=proportion of explained variance). in the
four level model this would be
(var(phat))/((var(phat)+((pi2)/3))+var(level2)+var(level3)+var(level4))
(see snijders & bosker 1999: 225).
using gllamm i always had pseudo r2 around 0.20, and now using xtmelogit
it is supposed to be only around 0.01. does anyone have an idea, why
this could have happened and how these differences could be explained?
thanks! martina
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/