Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Oaxaca and heckmanan


From   ncdcta00@uniroma2.it
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Oaxaca and heckmanan
Date   Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:15:55 +0200

Thanks a lot Ben for your help.
I try to use oaxaca but in the output I don't see the selection effect, I use
oaxaca male female, adjust(lambda).
Thanks again.
Best,



Quoting Ben Jann <ben.jann@gmail.com>:

The effect of selection is the remainder, i.e. the difference between
the raw differential and the selection adjusted differential. It is
reported at the end of -decompose-'s output ("... differential due to
selection variable ...").

Also have a look at the -oaxaca- command, available from the SSC
Archive (type -ssc install oaxaca-), which is a successor of
-decompose-.

ben

On 9/30/07, ncdcta00@uniroma2.it <ncdcta00@uniroma2.it> wrote:
Dear Statalist,
I try to do an estimation with oaxaca and heckman and I want to
separate the effects of selection, endowment and remuneration.
I use the command decompose, lambda(lbda) but this command return me
only two effects: endowment and remuration.
How I can separate the other effect (selection)?
I will appreciate any help to solve this problem.
Thanks in advance
Best,
Catia.



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index