[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Timothy Dang" <tpondang@gmail.com> |

To |
stata <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>, tpondang@gmail.com |

Subject |
st: marginal effects from clogit with lots of control dummies |

Date |
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:31:47 -0700 |

Hello- I'm estimating the rules for buyer purchase decisions in an experiment with what amounts to panel data. Buyers can purchase any one of 3 goods or purchase nothing, and this occurs repeatedly for 20 periods. The basic decision model is: Pr(choice i) = e(b0+b1*Price_i+b2*OtherThings_i) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1+ Sum(for j=1,2,3)[e(b0+b0*Price_j+b2*OtherThings_j)] I'm taking each buyer decision and breaking it up into 4 records--one for each possible decision, in order to use clogit for the estimation. To control for dependencies I'm actually running the regression as: xi: clogit choiceflag NotOO Price OtherThings i.Group*NotOO i.Period*NotOO i.Subject*NotOO, group(id) In the above "id" is a unique number for the original record before I breaks it up into 4 records. So "id" is the number of a specific decision. "NotOO" is a flag which is 1 when the decision is actually to purchase something and 0 when the decision is to purchase nothing--its coefficient will be the b0 in the model. Group, Period, and Subject are all things which could be reasonably expected to have interdependencies. I interact them with NotOO to maintain the distinction between purchasing something and nothing. The regression results seem reasonable. Individually, none of the controls are significant, but jointly they are. But I also want marginal effects, and when I ask for those the marginal effects of the variables I'm actually concerned with are very nearly zero and insignificant. I'm pretty sure this is wrong, and an artefact of the way I'm doing the regression. When I leave off the dummy terms the coefficients are very nearly the same, and marginal effects are significant in both size and p-value. Actually, the one exception to this is the constant term which goes from around 2 to around 25, andfrom statistically significant to not, when the control dummies are added. So, I'm hoping for advice on either the mechanics or theory of what's going on. As an aside, I'm using clogit rather than mlogit because of what appears to be a bug with mlogit. When I run the same model with mlogit (using a single record per decision instead of 4 records, and constraints to fit the model), one of the coefficients for one of the choices winds up getting dropped for no sensible reason. Thanks -Timothy ------------------------------ Timothy O'Neill Dang / Cretog8 623-587-0532 One monkey don't stop no show. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: marginal effects from clogit with lots of control dummies***From:*"Timothy Dang" <tpondang@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Chi-square test for Categorical Data Analysis** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: A Question on Looping** - Previous by thread:
**st: Split by calendar year (stset & stsplit)** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: marginal effects from clogit with lots of control dummies** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |