[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Standard error of the estimate for svy: reg

From   Steven Samuels <>
Subject   Re: st: Standard error of the estimate for svy: reg
Date   Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:58:46 -0400

Lost Line

I don't have access to this journal. My question: standard error of WHAT estimate?


On Aug 22, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Richard Forshee wrote:

Sacrificial line

A recent article in my field encourages reporting both the R- squared and the
Standard Error of the Estimate (or Root MSE). (James S. Krueger and Michael
S. Lewis-Beck. Goodness-of-Fit: R-Squared, SEE and ‘Best Practice’. The
Political Methodologist, vol. 15, no. 1, pp 2-4. 2007)

When I run a svy: reg command, I do not see the SEE (or Root MSE) reported.
I checked ereturn list, and I did not see anything that appeared to be the
SEE. Is there a way calculate the SEE when running a svy: reg command?
Maybe it could be derived using the predict , stdp postestimation command?
Or is there a reason that SEE is not appropriate in the context of a svy:
reg command?

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index