[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: factor analysis - interpreting the results, inclusion of dp variable

From   SR Millis <>
Subject   Re: st: factor analysis - interpreting the results, inclusion of dp variable
Date   Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:22:07 -0700 (PDT)

Hi, Georg,

I'm not certain that I would do a factor analysis with
your data.  Your sample size is large enough to have a
an adequate variable-to-subject ratio. The variable
reduction techniques such PCA are useful primarily
when you need a data/variable reduction
technique--which doesn't seem to be the case here. In
addition, the factors/PCAs add interpretive
complexity.  Moreover, it looks like you're extracting
a large number of factors--which is worrisome.

My inclination would be to fit your model with
individual variables---and to consider the use of
restricted cublic splines if your data warrant their

No, I wouldn't include the "dependent" variable in a
factor analysis or PCA.

SR Millis

--- georg wernicke <>

> Dear SR Mills,
> thank you very much for your help. It is most
> appreciated. I am just
> going over the mentioned article, it seems as i have
> some
> collinearity. i dropped 2 variables which are
> indicated as collinear
> by the belsley threshold, the factortest immideately
> went up from 4 to
> 7 factors and will prob. improve once i have
> corrected for all
> possibly collinear variables.
> however, do i include the dependent variable in the
> factor equation?
> (e.g. factor dependent independent1 independent2
> etc..)
> and what do i get from knowing that the factor
> analysis gives me lets
> say 9 factors?
> once again, thanxs for your help
> george

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index