[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
nicola.baldini2@unibo.it |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: stochastic translog cost frontier: constraints, system |

Date |
Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:43:03 +0200 |

No answers for you. I just wanted to let you know that in FRONTIER4.1 the explanatory variables must be put in a certain order because the software must recognize them. It is not different from Stata (note the capital letter!), where the dependent variable comes first, and then the independent variables. This prevents you from using an heavier notation, which do not rely on positions, like command x(name of the independents) y(name of the depeendents). Nicola At 02.33 08/08/2007 -0400, "Rat-Wirtzler Julie" wrote: >I am very novice in estimating cost frontiers with stata. > >First, I want to estimate a simple frontier cost function (using a translo= >g >form) and I don't see any recommandations about the order of variables in >the help for the frontier command. In FRONTIER4.1 the explanatory variables >must be put in a certain order, say, output first and then the prices of >inputs. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Dropping Variables - Simple Question** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: when to use the heckman two step instead of the maximum likelihood heckman** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: stochastic translog cost frontier: constraints, system** - Next by thread:
**st: update to -ralloc-** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |