[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Zou Hong" <hzou@ln.edu.hk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: Re: use mfx to compute marginal effects in tobit |

Date |
Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:06:30 +0800 |

Dear All,

Further to my previous query, I estimate a tobit model and then use "mfx" to compute marginal effects of variables. Strangely, the computed marginal effects for all the variables are the same as the estimated cofficient in the probit model. It seems "mfx" does not function. But I found it does function following a probit model (i.e., generating the same marginal effects as that is generated from "dprobit").

I enclose the model output using two variables for your information.

Thanks

Hong Zou

----- Original Message ----- From: "Zou Hong" <hzou@ln.edu.hk>

To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>

Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 9:35 AM

Subject: st: Re:tobit model robust standard errors and marginal effects

Dear All,

I want to report the results from estimating a Tobit model (left censored at zero) using robust standard errors and marginal effects (which by default are evaluated at the sample mean of variables).

I have done a search and found that somebody suggesting using "intreg" to get the robust standard errors and p-values. For marginal effects, somebody suggested using dtobit, dtobit2 and/or mfx. However, it seems these routines do not allow for the use of robust standard errors.

I wonder how I can report a Tobit model using robust standard errors and marginal effects at the same time? Can I use "intreg" and request "robust" option, followed by "mfx"?

Many thanks

Hong Zou

----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>

Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 4:27 AM

Subject: RE: st: RE: mlogit problem with "predict"

-stripplot- from SSC will let you compare variables in groups. stripplot pc1-pc4, by(tax) gives you one graph, not four. See the help for further options. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Maarten buis--- Sheela Athreya <athreya@neo.tamu.edu> wrote: > The idea that maybe I have an (almost) perfect prediction occurred > to me too, but I don't know how to investigate it. Perhaps there is > an equivalent test to -tab tax pc- that allows me to look at > quantitative variables for anything that is off? One option is to look at dotplots: dotplot pc1, over(tax) median dotplot pc2, over(tax) median dotplot pc3, over(tax) median dotplot pc4, over(tax) median They give you simultaneously an idea about the strength of the association and the number of observations in each category.* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Attachment:
tobit marginal effects output.pdf**

**References**:**RE: st: RE: mlogit problem with "predict"***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**st: Re:tobit model robust standard errors and marginal effects***From:*"Zou Hong" <hzou@ln.edu.hk>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: stcox output: p-value and CI don't agree** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: stcox output: p-value and CI don't agree** - Previous by thread:
**st: Re:tobit model robust standard errors and marginal effects** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: mlogit problem with "predict"** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |