Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: RE: Identifier from three variables


From   n j cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   st: RE: RE: Identifier from three variables
Date   Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:22:11 +0100

This isn't another way of doing it. It is a variation
on a way already discussed in this thread by Svend Juul
and indeed by myself (#3 in the post to which this
post replies).

Generating a numeric identifier by this method has no
real advantages that I can see and at least five disadvantages
compared with concatenation of strings:

1. You need to check the limits of each identifier,
as Rafael points out, as the result will be legal to Stata.

2. If you forget #1 or make a mistake on #1, the resulting
problems may not be obvious.

3. Here the default variable type is a -float-. Using
that to hold (very large) integers could run into precision
problems. Rafael is careful to recommend using a -double-
if needed but the problem is that everyone has to remember to do
that.

4. Concatenation can make use of separators, as in

egen id = concat(house family individual), p("_")

5. The reverse engineering from composite to
individual identifiers is easier with -split-
(provided you follow #4) than it is usually is
with composite integers.

Rafael's method, which is quite often used, is relatively
simple and can be unproblematic, but it is not a good
general method in my view.

Nick
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk

Rafael Osorio

Other way of doing it, supposing each identifier is <= 99:

gen id = house*1000+family*100+individual

By doing it this way you can tell to which house and family a specific person belongs to. If your data was not sorted by the identifiers, if you sort by this new identifier the result will be equal to sorting it by all identifiers. If your final id is large: gen double id...

If your identifiers are greater than 99, adjust the multipliers.

Nick Cox

1. Don't do that. Use -egen, group()- with the -label- option.

2. See also

FAQ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Creating group identifiers
3/01 How do I create individual identifiers numbered
from 1 upwards?
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/data/group.html

3. If you really must, look into -egen, concat()-, including
its options.

Nick
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk

Nádia N. Simőes
>
> How can I generate an identifier from three variables?
> In my data I have a column for the house, one for the family
> and one for the individual
>
> example:
>
> house family individual
> 1 1 1
> 1 1 2
> 1 1 3
> 2 1 1
> 2 1 2
> ...
>
> and I would like to know how can I create an identifier per
> individual such as:
>
> individual
> 010101
> 010102
> 010103
> 020101
> ...


*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index