Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: equivalence tests


From   Joseph Coveney <jcoveney@bigplanet.com>
To   Statalist <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: equivalence tests
Date   Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:33:15 +0900

Ronan Conroy wrote (excerpted):

. . . Celine may be more interested in
testing for equivalence where this may be defined asymmetrically as
no less than x and no more than y units of difference. The original -
equim- and -equip- routines do only symmetrical tests, where x and y
are the same.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's my understanding that -equim- and -equip- do allow for asymmetric
deltas, using options -delta()- and -sdelta()-.

Also, I'm curious as to what problems Celine had in resolving the results in
the Stata Technical Bulletin article for -equim- and -equip with formulas in
the Hwang and Morikawa review article (full text at
http://www.diahome.org/content/abstract/1999/d3341205.pdf ).

Joseph Coveney

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index