[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: What is seemingly unrelated regression?

From   "Mak, Timothy" <>
To   <>
Subject   st: What is seemingly unrelated regression?
Date   Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:40:44 +0100

Hi Statalist, 

Forgive me for more of a statistical question than a Stata question, but
I only recently found out about seemingly unrelated regression (SUR). I
dug up the Zellner (1962) paper, and it says that: 

	Under conditions generally encountered in practice, it is found
that the regression coefficient estimators so obtained are at least
asymptotically more efficient than those obtained by an
equation-by-equation application of least squares. 

Interesting claim - does it imply that whenever we're doing more than
one regression on the same dataset, we should be using SUR? 

Anyway, I ran a small test. First I created a 5-dimensional multivariate
normal sample of size 10000. Correlations between the 5 variables are
all 0.3. I generated y = 0.1 * (x1+ x2 + x3 + x4 + x5) + u, where x1-x5
are the variables just created, and u is an error term generated
separately by -uniform-. And I regressed y on x1, x2, x3, etc,
separately using -reg-, and together using -sureg-. As expected the
-reg- estimates were around 0.22 (=0.1 + 4 * 0.3 * 0.1 + ...). But the
-sureg- estimates were around 0.02. If these were estimates of the
relationship between y and x1, x2, etc, then these are clearly biased. I
suppose then that these estimates are not estimating the same things as
-reg- estimates. But then what are these estimating? 

Sorry if this is really elementary. I haven't studied econometrics but
would like to learn a bit more about statistics. 



*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index