[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Knag Anne-Christine <anne-christine.knag@imr.no> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: [Fwd: st: Kolmogorov Smirnov, groupvar as cumulative relativefrequencies or rawdata?] |

Date |
Mon, 09 Jul 2007 08:50:14 +0200 |

Title:

Hi,

Sorry about that, let me ask the question again, without the .dat:

Should groupvar in stata consist of raw data or already calculated cumulative relative frequencies..? I've done the latter, but now I see that other statistical-packages wants raw data and calculate the cumulative relative frequencies automatically.

I get the feeling from the help file that I have assumed correctly and that stata wants the cumulative rel. frequencies of the variable you want to test. Am I correct?

ksmirnov performs one- and two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests of the

equality of distributions. In the first syntax, varname is the variable

whose distribution is being tested, and exp must evaluate to the

corresponding (theoretical) cumulative. In the second syntax, groupvar

must take on two distinct values. The distribution of varname for the

first value of groupvar is compared with that of the second value

Regards,

AC

On 7/7/07 11:25 PM, "Marcello Pagano" <pagano@biostat.harvard.edu> wrote:

Please, Anne-Christine,

Do not attach your winmail.dat to messages to the list.

Thanks,

m.p.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: st: Kolmogorov Smirnov, groupvar as cumulative relative frequencies or rawdata?

Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 20:02:16 +0200

From: Knag Anne-Christine <anne-christine.knag@imr.no> <mailto:anne-christine.knag@imr.no>

Reply-To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu

To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> <mailto:statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>

References: <002601c7c009$572c7b00$8f9e5680@a8js><E1E6452315B4DA40889EFA84D436380F045F4A@wpmailp5.rjr.com> E1E6452315B4DA40889EFA84D436380F045F4A@wpmailp5.rjr.com"><mailto:E1E6452315B4DA40889EFA84D436380F045F4A@wpmailp5.rjr.com> <001301c7c0a2$1bb0b930$8f9e5680@a8js> <fcffff0d0707070801v5f438f06p3c4d920815b67ad@mail.gmail.com> fcffff0d0707070801v5f438f06p3c4d920815b67ad@mail.gmail.com"><mailto:fcffff0d0707070801v5f438f06p3c4d920815b67ad@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Should groupvar in stata consist of raw data or already calculated cumulative relative frequencies..? I've done the latter, but now I see that other statistical-packages wants raw data and calculate the cumulative relative frequencies automatically.

I get the feeling from the help file that I have assumed correctly and that stata wants the cumulative rel. frequencies of the variable you want to test. Am I correct?

ksmirnov performs one- and two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests of the

equality of distributions. In the first syntax, varname <https://webpost.imr.no/help.cgi?varname> is the variable

whose distribution is being tested, and exp <https://webpost.imr.no/help.cgi?exp> must evaluate to the

corresponding (theoretical) cumulative. In the second syntax, groupvar <https://webpost.imr.no/help.cgi?varlist>

must take on two distinct values. The distribution of varname for the

first value of groupvar is compared with that of the second value

Regards,

AC

- Prev by Date:
**st: Implementing restricted least squares (with hds97?)** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Implementing restricted least squares (with hds97?)** - Previous by thread:
**st: Implementing restricted least squares (with hds97?)** - Next by thread:
**st: comparing xtgls and xtreg,re** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |