[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Arne Risa Hole" <arnehole@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: hetereoskedasticity/serial correlation with RE xtprobit xttobit? |

Date |
Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:34:19 +0100 |

Thanks Austin for mentioning my -clogithet- module and paper. I'm afraid, however, that -clogithet- does not estimate a fixed effects logit with heteroscedasticity but McFadden's choice model with het - although Stata's -clogit- command can estimate homoscedastic versions of both of these -clogithet- only does the latter unfortunately. What you could do is estimate a hetersocedastic binary logit model with het using -clogithet- with cluster-robust standard errors, along the lines of AttaUllah Shah's suggestion. You can also use -hetprob- in this manner if you prefer a probit model. Arne On 06/07/07, Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote:

Jessica <jholmes@middlebury.edu> : I don't know about the tests for het or clustering after -xtprobit- and -xttobit- (perhaps someone else on the list can address these). -ssc install clogithet- gives you a test for heteroskedasticity in a fixed-effects logit model, described in Hole, A.R., 2006. Small-sample properties of tests for heteroscedasticity in the conditional logit model. Economics Bulletin 3, 1-14. http://economicsbulletin.vanderbilt.edu/2006/volume3/EB-06C20063A.pdf However, it seems to me your reviewer missed the main problem, that -xttobit- is the wrong model. You seem to be estimating ln(real y + 1) as a function of X with a lower limit of 1. But ln(1)=0 --how many left-censored observations does Stata report? Is it the same as the number of obs where y=0?. Or perhaps you are estimating ln(real y + exp(1)) as a function of X with a lower limit of 1, where the lower limit makes more sense for a depvar y>=0. This still assumes that the values observed at zero really should be mostly negative, and the underlying distribution is normal, but this is unlikely to be the case. What you really want is a GLM model or -poisson- type model, right? See e.g. http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2007-04/msg00549.html http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2006-12/msg00466.html I would recommend you replace -xttobit- using lnreal1 as the depvar with -xtpoisson- using real as the depvar. In general, adding some number to y, taking the log, and running a -tobit- type model is unjustifiable. For one, your estimates will differ depending on what number you specify, and there is rarely a theoretical justification for one number over another. On a more substnantive point, are there no fixed time effects in your model? To the extent that marginal tax rates and the deductability of giving varies over time, you would at least want to include year effects, I think, even if you can't estimate first-dollar marginal tax rates for individuals (to get a plausibly exogenous tax-price of giving). On 7/6/07, Holmes, Jessica <jholmes@middlebury.edu> wrote: > Hope someone can help! I am using a panel data set that looks at > charitable giving for 22,000 individuals over 15 years. > > I use a random effects Probit to predict whether an individual donates > in a given year and a random effects Tobit to predict how much he/she > gives each year: > > xtprobit donate male yrsgrad yrsgradsq mar alumnicloserelative > med_income artsent bankfin commedia comptech consulting education > environmental govtpp healthcaremed intlang law nonprofitsocialservices > profservicesbus salesmarketing ownbusiness mileslt250 reunion soc > affinity acad devug arts campus sports otheract socsci natsci art > nongrad loans_z grants_z finaid_miss djia_pctch campaignyr hock_pc rank > hock_pc_male hock_pc_yrsgrad hock_pc_sports rank_male rank_yrsgrad if > stillug==0, i(pidm) > > xttobit lnreal1 male yrsgrad yrsgradsq mar alumnicloserelative > med_income artsent bankfin commedia comptech consulting education > environmental govtpp healthcaremed intlang law nonprofitsocialservices > profservicesbus salesmarketing ownbusiness mileslt250 reunion soc > affinity acad devug arts campus sports otheract socsci natsci art > nongrad loans_z grants_z finaid_miss djia_pctch campaignyr hock_pc rank > hock_pc_male hock_pc_yrsgrad hock_pc_sports rank_male rank_yrsgrad if > stillug==0, ll(1) i(pidm) > > > I have been asked by a referee to > > 1) test for hetereoskedasticity and correct if necessary > > and > > 2) test for serial correlaton and correct if necessary. > > Stata does not seem to have any commands to detect and/or correct for > hetereoskedasticity and serial correlation for xtprobit or xttobit. Any > suggestions would be most appreciated... > > Thanks, > > Jessica * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: hetereoskedasticity/serial correlation with RE xtprobit xttobit?***From:*"Arne Risa Hole" <arnehole@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: hetereoskedasticity/serial correlation with RE xtprobit xttobit?***From:*"Holmes, Jessica" <jholmes@middlebury.edu>

**Re: st: hetereoskedasticity/serial correlation with RE xtprobit xttobit?***From:*"Austin Nichols" <austinnichols@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Copy table--how to consistently get correct tab stops** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Copy table--how to consistently get correct tab stops** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: hetereoskedasticity/serial correlation with RE xtprobit xttobit?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: hetereoskedasticity/serial correlation with RE xtprobit xttobit?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |