Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Re: robust SE with a twostep option in ivprobit


From   Prabal Kumar De <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Re: robust SE with a twostep option in ivprobit
Date   Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:09:08 -0400

Thanks a lot. This is really helpful.
  Best,
     Prabal

***************************************************
Prabal Kr. De
Department of Economics, New York University










----- Original Message -----
From: "Rodrigo A. Alfaro" <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, June 29, 2007 11:20 am
Subject: st: Re: robust SE with a twostep option in ivprobit
To: [email protected]


> It is in the help file. You could use jackknifed or boostraped std errors.
>  The White-robustness seems not applicable because 2-step does not
>  have gradient to evaluate.
>
>  /// Example
>  sysuse auto
>  ivprobit foreign mpg (price =  trunk weight length), twostep
>  ivprobit foreign mpg (price =  trunk weight length), twostep vce(jack)
>  /// End
>
>  Rodrigo.
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: "Prabal Kumar De" <[email protected]>
>  To: <[email protected]>
>  Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 4:44 PM
>  Subject: st: robust SE with a twostep option in ivprobit
>
>
> > Is there a way to calculate robust SE with a twostep option in ivprobit?
> >  Prabal
> >
> > ***************************************************
> > Prabal Kr. De
> > Department of Economics, New York University
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Benjamin Allaire <[email protected]>
> > Date: Thursday, June 28, 2007 4:19 pm
> > Subject: st: Fixed effects - DD question
> > To: [email protected]
> >
> >
> >> :01C7B9B0]
> >>  Sender: [email protected]
> >>  Precedence: bulk
> >>  Reply-To: [email protected]
> >>  Errors-To: [email protected]
> >>  Hi there -
> >>  I know this is a trivial question, but I'm having trouble figuring
> >> out the
> >>  way to fix it - I received a comment on a paper of mine that I should
> >> use
> >>  individual level fixed effects, but I'm using the DD technique. I
> >> have grou=
> >>  p
> >>  A that is treated and a post treatment time dummy.
> >>
> >>  xtreg outcome d_groupA d_time_posttreat d_groupA_time_posttreat,
>
> >> i(personid=
> >>  )
> >>  fe
> >>
> >>  And stata dropped the d_groupA variable - my hunch it did that
> >> because in
> >>  the FE model, you can't have non-time varying characteristics - but
> >> I'm not
> >>  100% sure.  How would I implement this while adhering to the comment
> >> I
> >>  received on my paper?  Is there more data I need?  Am I just specifying
> >>  something in stata improperly?
> >>
> >>  Thanks,
> >>  Ben
> >>
> >>  _________________________________________________________________
> >>  Don=92t miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes
> from
> >> Microso=
> >>  ft
> >>  Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0540003042mrt/direct/01/
> >>
> >>  *
> >>  *   For searches and help try:
> >>  *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> >>  *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >>  *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >>
> > *
> > *   For searches and help try:
> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>  *
>  *   For searches and help try:
>  *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
>  *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>  *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index