Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: dropping observations


From   [email protected]
To   [email protected]
Subject   RE: st: dropping observations
Date   Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:34:34 +0200

ok, I'll do it tomorrow, as soon I as I will have access to my office's 
computer where the data are saved.
Thank you
Mariarosaria
Citazione Nick Cox <[email protected]>:

> I think we need to see some precise evidence of 
> what you think is problematic. Thus, we need to 
> see _exactly_ what you typed and _exactly_ what 
> Stata did -- as the FAQ advises. 
> 
> Nick 
> [email protected] 
> 
> [email protected]
>  
> > thank you for your answers,
> > evidently my question was not clear:
> > I am aware that STATA does not drop missing observations when 
> > using the 
> > regress command, it just does not use them, but I expect the 
> > same regression 
> > sample: 
> > if I drop the missing observations before the regression as 
> > if I just run the regression without dropping missing values...
> > thus, I don't understand why stata runs the regression on 
> > different samples 
> > when I use the two commands described before
> 
> Maarten buis 
> 
> > > --- [email protected] wrote:
> > > > when I use the following command:
> > > > drop if x>450
> > > > STATA drops a lot of observations, while when  I exclude missing
> > > > values as  follows:
> > > > drop if x>450 & x!=.
> > > > STATA eliminates just a couple of observations 
> > > 
> > > This is well known behaviour: In Stata missing values are 
> > the largest
> > > possible values, so a missing value will be larger than 
> > 450. As result
> > > if you type -drop if x>450- the missing values will also be dropped.
> > > 
> > > > I realized this when I run a regression including x as 
> > regressor. If
> > > > STATA drops missing data with the first command,  
> > shouldn't drop the
> > > > same observations when I run the regression after using the second
> > > > command?
> > > 
> > > I don't think I understand the question. Do you think that -regress-
> > > should influence the way -drop- behaves?
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index