Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: Robust Hausman for mlogit


From   "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: Robust Hausman for mlogit
Date   Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:26:55 +0100

Proper references please, not just authors' names and
an assumption that everyone knows the source. 

Nick 
[email protected] 

Wilson, Nathan
 
> I am trying to test the independence of irrelevant 
> alternatives (IIA) assumption required for the multinomial 
> logit specification.  
> 
> I know that this is generally tested using a standard Hausman 
> test, but it seems highly likely that my panel data is 
> characterized by clustered standard errors, which should make 
> the normal Hausman format inappropriate. Cameron and Trivedi 
> have some discussion of how to do a robust variation of the 
> Hausman (Section 21.4.3), but they consider the issue in the 
> context of random effects vs POLS vs FE etc. Moreover, the 
> statistical example they give just has one regressor, which 
> is not very helpful for me. 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index