Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: AW: biprobit vs. mvprobit


From   "Stephan Brunow" <stephan.brunow@tu-dresden.de>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: AW: biprobit vs. mvprobit
Date   Tue, 22 May 2007 20:43:02 +0200

Margherita, do they differ much? As far as I know, mvprobit fits SUR-like
probit's but not structural equations, where LHS variables enter on the RHS=
=2E
However, if this is not the case and again as far as I know, mvprobit uses
simulation methodes while biprobit does not. I can not check it for the
moment. But if this should be true, small differences might occur.
Stephan

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von
margherita.comola@upf.edu
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 20:32
An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Betreff: st: biprobit vs. mvprobit

Dear Statalister,

I have a sistem of two probit equations. Why estimation results differ if I
use biprobit or mvprobit?

Thanks
Margherita

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index