Statalist The Stata Listserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: robust with multinomial multilevel (gllamm)

From   "stata_user stata_user" <>
Subject   Re: st: robust with multinomial multilevel (gllamm)
Date   Thu, 17 May 2007 20:28:50 +0100

Thanks Maarten,

Do you mean that I can use the robust option?


From: Maarten buis <>
Subject: Re: st: robust with multinomial multilevel (gllamm)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:46:37 +0100 (BST)

--- stata_user stata_user <> wrote:
> I am using the gllamm program to estimate a multilevel multinomial
> model.
> I have the folliwing problem:
> Without the robust option one of my variables (binary variable) has
> a risk ratio of 2.2 but not significant , with the robust option the
> parameter becomes significant.

That isn't a problem. Robust doesn't necessarily mean larger standard
errors. I believe this is discussed in the User's manual (but I don't
have that at home so I can't check)

Hope this helps,

Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands

visiting address:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434

+31 20 5986715

Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for
your free account today*
* For searches and help try:
Txt a lot? Get Messenger FREE on your mobile.

* For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index