Re: st: an ordinary two-way table

["Michael Blasnik" <michael.blasnik@verizon.net>]

...
Actually, I just checked my original email and I did have line 2 below as 3 
separate lines in the original ado.

Michael
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Blasnik" <michael.blasnik@verizon.net>
To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: st: an ordinary two-way table



> ...
> The program apparently wrapped in the emailing at this section:
>
> > > syntax varlist( min=1 max=2) [if] [in], values(numlist)
> > > [MISSing] * if "`missing'"!="" {  local novarlist "novarlist"
> > > }
>
> This should be two lines
>
> line 1:
> syntax varlist( min=1 max=2) [if] [in], values(numlist)  [MISSing] *
>
> line 2:
> if "`missing'"!="" {  local novarlist "novarlist"}
>
>
> The second line should really be split up given more recent Stata conventions, 
> as:
>
> if "`missing'"!="" {
> local novarlist "novarlist"
> }
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/