Statalist The Stata Listserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Average partial effects after oprobit using margeff

From   "Simo Goshev" <>
To   <>
Subject   st: Average partial effects after oprobit using margeff
Date   Wed, 9 May 2007 07:57:30 -0400

Dear Stata users,

I have an issue with the estimation of average partial effects after
-oprobit- using -margeff-. Here is what I am observing: 

I run:

oprobit y x1 x2 x3

Then, I calculate manually the effect of a change in x1 (which is
continuous) in the first outcome category using the following steps:

oprobit y x1 x2 x3 
predict xb if e(sample), xb
gen out1 = (-1*(_b[x1])) * (normalden(_b[/cut1]- xb))
sum out1

The calculated mean is the average partial effect of x1.
Now, when I compare the estimated APE from -margeff- with the above mean,
the manually estimated effect turns out to be more than two times bigger in
magnitude than the one provided by -margeff-. 

I also changed the sample and repeated the procedure. The effects were still
substantially different (although this time the -margeff- provided effect
was larger).

I would appreciate any ideas or suggestions.

Best regards,
Simo Goshev

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index