There is most probably a better way to do it but this is what comes to mind:
describe
local no_vars = `r(k)'
di "`no_vars'"
Hope this helps.
Rodrigo Martell
<http://www.frontier-economics.com>
Frontier Economics Pty. Ltd.
395 Collins Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
Australia
www.frontier-economics.com
switch:
direct:
fax:
mobile:
email:
+61 (0)3 9620 4488
+61 (0)3 9613 1518
+61 (0)3 8614 2711
+61 (0)407 909 811
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, disclosure or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorised to receive information for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Yan Zhang
Sent: Tuesday, 3 April 2007 2:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: Any way to represent the total number of variables in
STATA?
Hi, everyone:
Does anybody know the way to represent the total
number of variables in STATA? Just like we use _N to
represent the total number of observations. Any reply
will be highly appreciated.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Thanks,
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
