Statalist The Stata Listserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: Survival analysis: finding best cut-off values

From   Diego Bellavia <>
Subject   Re: st: RE: Survival analysis: finding best cut-off values
Date   Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:36:52 +0000 (GMT)

mmhh, Ok.

I will not do that in the future, but then, what is the most efficient way to find 
cut-off values for predictors ? 


----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: Nick Cox <>
Inviato: Marted́ 6 marzo 2007, 15:29:04
Oggetto: st: RE: Survival analysis: finding best cut-off values

The practice of dividing good continuous
variables into categories is retrograde. 
See Frank Harrell's book on "Regression modeling
strategies" from Springer in 2001. 


Diego Bellavia

> I am performing a survival analysis on a dataset with many 
> variables. Multivariate cox proportional-hazard models 
> defined the best predictors (around 7 out of 270 variables). 
> I would like to give the readers some cut-off values 
> they can use in the clinical practice, so I divided the most 
> significant predictors in tertiles, create the dummy variables 
> and run Cox models for each variable (groups of dummy vars). 
> Doing so, I obtain significant/unsignificant tertiles and 
> Kaplan-Meyer graphs 
> stratified by tertiles. Thsi way works pretty well. But what 
> if I would like to find only one cut-off per variable ? 
> I thought to use ROC curves to define the best diagnostic 
> cut-offs and see if they are good also for prognosis, but 
> unfortunately not all the best
> predictors are so good also to discriminate groups of patients. 
> In conclusion my question is: there is a way to obtain the 
> best prognostic cut-off value using Cox models ? 

*   For searches and help try:


L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index