[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: Typo: approximation for binormal a la Gould, et.al.?
Sorry there was a typo in my previous posting... here is the correct one
On 2/5/07, Robert Duval <email@example.com> wrote:
In the ml book (Gould, Pitblado and Sribney) it is mentioned that
1-normal(a) is a poor numerical approximation for Pr(x>a) and instead
they suggest using
Does anyone knows of a similar expression for the bivariate normal
case giving 1-Pr(x>a,y>b;rho) without using
i.e. without using substractions (or additions) that make the
approximation numerically poor.?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
* For searches and help try: