Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: panel re vs. fe model


From   "Austin Nichols" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: panel re vs. fe model
Date   Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:53:58 -0500

Jason-

I understood Tom's original post to say that he was including firm and
year fixed effects (firm effects via use of -xtreg- and year effects
via a set of indicator variables), and was clustering on firm to allow
arbitrary serial correlation of errors within panel, but was concerned
about the implications of the cluster() option for a downstream test,
which question Mark answered quickly.  I.e. he was not confusing the
cluster-robust estimator of the covariance matrix of the estimates
with the estimator that allows for individual-specific intercepts.  I
could be wrong, of course.

The trouble he alludes to in a subsequent post is that once you
consider the possibility of arbitrary serial correlation of errors
within panel, it is a small step to worry about correlation across
panels within a year.  As far as I know, a cluster-robust VCE
estimator with multiple levels of clustering is only possible via
-svyset- and the -svy- commands, but I would be happy to be
contradicted.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index