Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Estout for multiple heckman models


From   "Austin Nichols" <austinnichols@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Estout for multiple heckman models
Date   Tue, 7 Nov 2006 15:18:02 -0500

Matthew--
I do not use -estout- though I recommend it to others.  Hypocrisy
aside, I suspect the -keep- option needs you to specify the variables
in multi-equation models with an equation modifier preceding the
variable name.  See:

webuse nhanes2
foreach v of varlist *result {
cap heckman `v' black fem, select(bp*)
if _rc==498 reg `v' black fem
estimates store `v', title ((6))
}
est table *

The -estout- help file also refers to an option equations(eqmatchlist)
that is bound to be of some use here.

On 11/7/06, Matthew Pearson <pearson@ucdavis.edu> wrote:
I have been using the estout code at the bottom of this message for a
while with no problems.  However, when I recently changed some of the
models from reg to heckman, I can no longer get all of them to
display in the table.  The values in e( ) have the same name for both
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index