Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: Is Stata 9 really faster than stata 7?


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: Is Stata 9 really faster than stata 7?
Date   Wed, 1 Nov 2006 20:47:37 -0000

Absolutely no attachments, please. 

The "no attachments" rule is explained in the FAQ
(and the spelling "Stata"). 

When you joined the list, you were explicitly asked 
to read the FAQ _before_ posting. Each posting 
distributed to the list carries a reminder of the 
location of the FAQ. Once more, please read the FAQ! 
It is really is in your best interests if you wish 
to get and keep the good will of regular members of 
the list. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Shourun Guo

> It seems that I couldn't send message with attachement to 
> statalist. If
> anyone has interest to comapre, I can email my data (Stata 7 
> format) to your
> email. Just let me know. My computer is a Compaq with AMD XP 
> 2000+ 1.67 Ghz,
> 768 MB of RAM, Windows XP Home Edition with Service Pack 2. 
> STATA version:
> 7.0 and 9.2 respectively. In Stata 9, I used -timer- to 
> measure time. In
> stata 7, I manually measured the time (-timer- is not there 
> in STATA 7).

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index