Hi, I always thought that using -exit- within a -program-
would terminate the program no matter what. However, I
now used -exit- within a -foreach- loop and -exit- did
not seem to have any effect. Here is an example:
<cut>
. prog test1
1. local num 1 2 3
2. foreach n of local num {
3. if "`n'"=="2" {
4. di "`n' => exit"
5. exit
6. }
7. di "`n'"
8. mac shift
9. }
10. di "not to be reached"
11. end
. test1
1
2 => exit
3
not to be reached
<cut>
Neither the -foreach- loop, nor the program is
terminated. This is not what I expected and I cannot
find anything about it in the documentation.
Furthermore, note that -exit- works as expected within
a -while- loop (this is documented in [P] while):
<cut>
. prog test2
1. local num 1 2 3
2. tokenize "`num'"
3. while "`1'"!="" {
4. if "`1'"=="2" {
5. di "`1' => exit"
6. exit
7. }
8. di "`1'"
9. mac shift
10. }
11. di "not to be reached"
12. end
. test2
1
2 => exit
<cut>
I checked the Statalist Archive and found a similar
thread, see
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2005-11/msg00809.html
Stephen Jenkins ([email protected]) reported a
problem with -exit- within a -forvalues- loop and
Ken Higbee ([email protected]) gave an answer. However,
Ken's answer does appear incorrect (or at least
incomplete) to me. Stephen's code looked something
like
forval i = ... {
...
if mod(...) == 0 {
...
exit
}
}
and part of Ken's answer was:
"-exit- without a return code (or in other words,
with a zero return code) pops you out of the current
process. The -if mod(...) == 0 { ... }- block is
considered a process, so the -exit- is only popping
you up out of that -if- block of code, and since the
return code is zero, there is no error and the -forval-
loop continues on its merry way."
However, -exit- does not terminate the loop even if
not included in an -if- block:
<cut>
. prog test
1. local list 1 2 3
2. foreach l of local list {
3. di "`l'"
4. exit
5. }
6. di "howdy"
7. end
. test
1
2
3
<cut>
Furthermore note that the -display- command after the
loop is not executed. So -exit- does not terminate
the loop but it terminates the program? Huh?
Although it is not much of a problem to me that -exit-
does not work within -foreach- (I just use -while-
instead of -foreach-), I'd like make the following
points:
- It is very irritating that -exit- has a different
effect in a -while- loop than in a -foreach- or
-forvalues- loop. One would not expect that and it
is likely to cause confusion. Documentation should
say something about it (especially since use of -exit-
is documented for -while-).
- It is still unclear to me what is going on. Why does
-exit- not terminate the program if used in a
-foreach- loop? Can anyone clarify? And what exactly
is a "process" in [P] exit?
- Ken's advice was to use -continue, break- ("Okay, so
what should you do? Use the -continue, break- command
to exit out of the -forval- loop; see '[P] continue'").
However, the reason for using -exit- is to terminate
the whole -program- (also in Stephen's case).
ben
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
