Statalist The Stata Listserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Re: RE: gls result by using sureg

From   "Rodrigo A. Alfaro" <>
To   <>
Subject   st: Re: RE: gls result by using sureg
Date   Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:34:03 -0400

Another guess, maybe they defined the model as twinL-twinH. Rodrigo.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven Stillman" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 10:01 PM
Subject: st: RE: gls result by using sureg

Just a guess, but perhaps they constrained the coefficients for each twin to
be identical.  This can be done using the multiple-equation syntax of sureg
and a cross-equation constraint for each RHS variable.


-----Original Message-----
[]On Behalf Of hai guo
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 10:10 AM
Subject: st: gls result by using sureg

Ashenfelter and Krueger 's paper in 1994 on the
estimates of the economic return to schooling from a
new sample of twins reported a GLS result. I am trying
to duplicate the result, however I don't know how. in
the dataset, they have wage, education, age, agesqu,
male and white for twin H and twin the result
table indicate that the sample size for the gls result
is 298 combining the twin H and L. in other words, it
has 149 Twin H and 149 Twin L. in the paper they
metioned that they apply the
seemingly-urelated-regression method due to ARnold
zellner to fit the GLS. so I tried to used
sureg(lhrwagel educl age agesq malel whitel) (lhrwageh
educh age agesq maleh whiteh) . however i got two sets
of coefficient with sample size 149 for each. I am
wondering how can i get only one set of coefficient
with sample size of 298. thanks

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index