Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: anova


From   "irodriguez" <irodriguez@utdt.edu>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: RE: anova
Date   Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:26:02 -0300

Ive made changes (from continuos to categorical variables) and now the 
command is working for some regressions
When a variable is categorical, how many categories anova analysis admit?
Thanks a lot

-----Original Message-----
From: "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:14:47 +0100
Subject: st: RE: anova

> The number of variables is not 
> problematic. 
> 
> I guess that not all your variables 
> are categorical; there is at least 
> one variable that would be better treated
> as continuous or is not appropriate for
> -anova-.  
> 
> Nick 
> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 
> 
> irodriguez
>  
> > Im trying to do a variance analysis 
> > Ive setted memory to 50 and matsize to 800
> > but when I use anova command stata gives me a message like this:
> > 
> > anova roa lagroa mu gama laggama
> > too many variables or values
> > r(146);
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index